Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Grok 4.6
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47, Grok 4.6 44). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max Preview
47/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
xAIGrok 4.6
44/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47/100, Grok 4.6 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max Preview on price and Qwen3.8 Max Preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · Grok 4.6 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 · Grok 4.6 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video · Grok 4.6: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Max Preview | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 48 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) | Grok 4.6xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 156.6 |
| ECI rank | — | #19 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 94.0% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 66.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 99.2% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 49.3% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 |
| Price source | Median of 6 providers | Official xAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 500,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 500,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | grok-4.6 |
| API providers | 6 | 29 (best) |
| Released | Jul 19, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Feb 1, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
- Grok 4.6$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Grok 4.6?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47/100, Grok 4.6 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max Preview on price and Qwen3.8 Max Preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Grok 4.6 cost the same: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet and Grok 4.6 has an ECI of 156.6.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Grok 4.6 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.6. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072, Grok 4.6 up to 500,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video; Grok 4.6 accepts text and images. Qwen3.8 Max Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Grok 4.6 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.6 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max Preview came out Jul 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.6 Feb 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedThree-way comparison
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs ParetoUnbiased
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Command A PlusCohere
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.6
- Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · ECI 156.3
