ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Gemini 3 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 52 to 47 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 33% cheaper per token.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max Preview

    Released Jul 19, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3 Pro Preview

    Released Nov 18, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI153.0
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is our pick

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Qwen3.8 Max Preview (47). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.8 Max Preview wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video · Gemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.8 Max PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview
Price50%2719
Inputs & features30%70100
Context window20%6061
Overall100%47/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—153.0
ECI rank—#39 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—92.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—91.4%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—72.9%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.00
Output$6.00 (best)$12.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$3.00 (best)$4.50
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 6 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoYes
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model ID——
API providers6 (best)3
ReleasedJul 19, 2026Nov 18, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
  • Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Qwen3.8 Max Preview (47). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.8 Max Preview wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). Gemini 3 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Max Preview versus $4.50 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet and Gemini 3 Pro Preview has an ECI of 153.0.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max Preview. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072, Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video; Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Gemini 3 Pro Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the newest, released Jul 19, 2026. Gemini 3 Pro Preview came out Nov 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.