ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Hy3

Qwen3.8 Flash comes out ahead, 76 to 58 and 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Flash

    Released Aug 26, 2026

    76/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.47
    • Context1M
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max 0902

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI155.2
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  3. Tencent

    Hy3

    Released Jul 6, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.132 / $0.53
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash is our pick

Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Hy3 (58) and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (50). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash $0.23 · Hy3 $0.232 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Flash 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 1,000,000 · Hy3 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Flash: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Hy3: Text
  • Self-hostingHy3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Max 0902Hy3
Price50%802780
Inputs & features30%808035
Context window20%606036
Overall100%76/10050/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Hy3 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen)Hy3Tencent
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—155.2—
ECI rank—#28 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—92.3%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—65.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—100%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—47.3%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$2.00$0.132 (best)
Output$0.47 (best)$6.00$0.53
Cached input$0.016——
Blended (3:1)$0.23 (best)$3.00$0.232
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 6 providersMedian of 15 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens (best)256,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · xhighYesYeshigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDqwen3.8-flash—hy3
API providers23 (best)618
ReleasedAug 26, 2026Sep 2, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.8 Flash$2.44
  • Qwen3.8 Max 0902$32.00
  • Hy3$2.38
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 or Hy3?

Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Hy3 (58) and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (50). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 or Hy3?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Hy3 costs $0.132 input / $0.53 output per million tokens (median across 15 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub); Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.23 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Flash versus $0.232 for Hy3 (1× as much) and $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (13× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3.8 Flash has not been scored yet, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has an ECI of 155.2 and Hy3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Hy3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 256,000 for Hy3. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Flash up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 up to 131,072, Hy3 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Hy3 accepts text. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Hy3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is the newest, released Sep 2, 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash came out Aug 26, 2026; Hy3 came out Jul 6, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.