Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs North Mini Code
Too close to call on our weighted score (North Mini Code 71, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Flash Next
70/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context262K
CohereNorth Mini Code
71/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: North Mini Code on price and Qwen3.8 Flash Next for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNorth Mini CodeNorth Mini Code Free · Qwen3.8 Flash Next $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 Flash NextQwen3.8 Flash Next 262,144 · North Mini Code 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Flash NextQwen3.8 Flash Next: Text, Images, Video · North Mini Code: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Flash Next | North Mini Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 76 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 70/100 | 71/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibaba (Qwen) | North Mini CodeCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 | Free (best) |
| Output | $0.50 | Free (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.275 | Free (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeshigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Openqwen-community-1.0 | Open |
| API model ID | — | north-mini-code-1-0 |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Aug 27, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 23, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Flash Next$3.00
- North Mini CodeFree
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Flash Next or North Mini Code?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: North Mini Code on price and Qwen3.8 Flash Next for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash Next or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). North Mini Code is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.8 Flash Next has not been scored yet and North Mini Code has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Flash Next and North Mini Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for North Mini Code. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Flash Next up to 131,072, North Mini Code up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images and video; North Mini Code accepts text. Qwen3.8 Flash Next handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (qwen-community-1.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the newest, released Aug 27, 2026. North Mini Code came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: North Mini Code Sep 23, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
