Qwen3.8 27B vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
Qwen3.8 27B comes out ahead, 57 to 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 27B
57/100- ECI149.4
- Price$0.40 / $2.50
- Context262K
Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$1.90 / $8.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.8 27B is our pick
Qwen3.8 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 27B $0.925 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.8 27B 262,144 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3.8 27B: Text, Images, Video · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 27B | Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 25 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen) | Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 149.4 | — |
| ECI rank | #53 of 148 | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.40 (best) | $1.90 |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $8.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.925 (best) | $3.42 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 39 providers | Median of 11 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 41 (best) | 11 |
| Released | Aug 14, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 27B$9.00
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 27B or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?
Qwen3.8 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 39 API providers). Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed costs $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.925 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 27B versus $3.42 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (3.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.8 27B has an ECI of 149.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 27B and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 27B and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 27B up to 32,768, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 27B accepts text, images and video; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 27B is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed came out Jun 12, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Inkling SmallThree-way comparison
- Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling SmallThinking Machines · ECI 150.2
- Qwen3.8 27B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- Qwen3.8 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
- Qwen3.8 27B vs Grok 4.3xAI · ECI 149.2
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Command A PlusCohere
