ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Inkling Small

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 70, Qwen3.7 Plus 70). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Plus

  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI150.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Inkling Small

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityInkling SmallCapabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 · Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.675 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.7 PlusInkling Small
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%7578
Price25%5758
Inputs & features15%8070
Context window10%6061
Overall100%70/10070/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)147.4150.2 (best)
ECI rank#61 of 148#47 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions87.9%88.5% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics34.4%46.3% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics93.3% (best)90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40 (best)$0.50
Output$1.60$1.20 (best)
Cached input$0.04—
Blended (3:1)$0.70$0.675 (best)
Long-context rateOver 256K: $1.20 / $4.80Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoYes
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model IDqwen3.7-plus—
API providers25 (best)11
ReleasedJun 2, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
  • Inkling Small$7.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling Small?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.675 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Inkling Small scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 (#47 of 148) and Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4 (#61 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.5–152.1 vs 145.7–148.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Inkling Small 88.5%, Qwen3.7 Plus 87.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Inkling Small 46.3%, Qwen3.7 Plus 34.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.7 Plus 93.3%, Inkling Small 90.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.7 Plus and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Inkling Small leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons