Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.5 Flash 69, Claude Sonnet 5 66, Qwen3.7 Max 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.7 Max
58/100- ECI153.7
- Price$2.50 / $7.50
- Context1M
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
66/100- ECI156.3
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1M
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
69/100- ECI154.5
- Price$1.50 / $9.00
- Context1.05M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.5 Flash 69/100, Claude Sonnet 5 66/100, Qwen3.7 Max 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 5 for raw capability, Gemini 3.5 Flash on price and Gemini 3.5 Flash for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Sonnet 5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 5 156.3 · Gemini 3.5 Flash 154.5 · Qwen3.7 Max 153.7
- Lowest priceGemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash $3.38 · Qwen3.7 Max $3.75 · Claude Sonnet 5 $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Max 1,000,000 · Claude Sonnet 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max: Text · Claude Sonnet 5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 3.5 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.7 Max | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 83 | 86 | 84 |
| Price | 25% | 23 | 21 | 25 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 80 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 66/100 | 69/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 153.7 | 156.3 (best) | 154.5 |
| ECI rank | #37 of 148 | #23 of 148 (best) | #33 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 90.9% | 90.5% | 92.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 64.6% | 65.6% (best) | 62.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 95.6% (best) | 94.7% | 95.6% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 77.3% | — | 79.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 55.8% | 33.7% | 66.2% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.50 | $2.00 | $1.50 (best) |
| Output | $7.50 (best) | $10.00 | $9.00 |
| Cached input | $0.50 | $0.20 | $0.15 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75 | $4.00 | $3.38 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Anthropic API | Official Google API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.7-max | claude-sonnet-5 | gemini-3.5-flash |
| API providers | 26 | 38 (best) | 32 |
| Released | May 21, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | May 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.7 Max$40.00
- Claude Sonnet 5$40.00
- Gemini 3.5 Flash$33.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.7 Max, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.5 Flash 69/100, Claude Sonnet 5 66/100, Qwen3.7 Max 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 5 for raw capability, Gemini 3.5 Flash on price and Gemini 3.5 Flash for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.38 per million tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash versus $3.75 for Qwen3.7 Max (1.1× as much) and $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 5 156.3 (#23 of 148), Gemini 3.5 Flash 154.5 (#33 of 148) and Qwen3.7 Max 153.7 (#37 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.6–158.8 vs 152.5–156.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.5 Flash 92.8%, Qwen3.7 Max 90.9%, Claude Sonnet 5 90.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Claude Sonnet 5 65.6%, Qwen3.7 Max 64.6%, Gemini 3.5 Flash 62.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.7 Max 95.6%, Gemini 3.5 Flash 95.6%, Claude Sonnet 5 94.7%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.5 Flash 66.2%, Qwen3.7 Max 55.8%, Claude Sonnet 5 33.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Sonnet 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Sonnet 5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Max and 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.7 Max up to 65,536, Claude Sonnet 5 up to 128,000, Gemini 3.5 Flash up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.7 Max accepts text; Claude Sonnet 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.5 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3.7 Max, Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the newest, released Jun 30, 2026. Qwen3.7 Max came out May 21, 2026; Gemini 3.5 Flash came out May 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Sonnet 5 Jan 31, 2026, Gemini 3.5 Flash Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
