Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.3 Codex
GPT-5.3 Codex comes out ahead, 64 to 58 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.7 Max is 22% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.7 Max
58/100- ECI153.7
- Price$2.50 / $7.50
- Context1M
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
64/100- ECI156.8
- Price$1.75 / $14.00
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5.3 Codex is our pick
GPT-5.3 Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Qwen3.7 Max (58). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Qwen3.7 Max wins on price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-5.3 CodexCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 · Qwen3.7 Max 153.7
- Lowest priceQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.7 Max $3.75 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.7 Max 1,000,000 · GPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.3 CodexQwen3.7 Max: Text · GPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.7 Max | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 83 | 87 |
| Price | 25% | 23 | 18 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 64/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 153.7 | 156.8 (best) |
| ECI rank | #37 of 148 | #18 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 64.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 95.6% | — |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 77.3% (best) | 74.8% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 55.8% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.50 | $1.75 (best) |
| Output | $7.50 (best) | $14.00 |
| Cached input | $0.50 | $0.175 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75 (best) | $4.81 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.7-max | gpt-5.3-codex |
| API providers | 26 (best) | 19 |
| Released | May 21, 2026 | Feb 5, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Aug 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Qwen3.7 Max$40.00
GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.7 Max or GPT-5.3 Codex?
GPT-5.3 Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Qwen3.7 Max (58). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Qwen3.7 Max wins on price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or GPT-5.3 Codex?
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper at $2.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.75 per million tokens for Qwen3.7 Max versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 (#18 of 148) and Qwen3.7 Max 153.7 (#37 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.5–160.8 vs 151.9–156.0), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SWE-bench Verified — Qwen3.7 Max 77.3%, GPT-5.3 Codex 74.8%.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max resolves more real GitHub issues on SWE-bench Verified: Qwen3.7 Max 77.3% and GPT-5.3 Codex 74.8%. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.7 Max up to 65,536, GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.7 Max accepts text; GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-5.3 Codex handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3.7 Max and GPT-5.3 Codex are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.7 Max is the newest, released May 21, 2026. GPT-5.3 Codex came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.