Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B vs GLM-5
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 68, Qwen3.6 27B 65, GLM-5 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6 27B
65/100- ECI146.5
- Price$0.60 / $3.60
- Context262K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
68/100- ECI143.9
- Price$0.248 / $1.49
- Context262K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5
55/100- ECI145.8
- Price$1.00 / $3.20
- Context205K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 68/100, Qwen3.6 27B 65/100, GLM-5 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.6 27B for raw capability and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.6 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 27B 146.5 · GLM-5 145.8 · Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 143.9
- Lowest priceQwen3.6 35B-A3BQwen3.6 35B-A3B $0.557 · Qwen3.6 27B $1.35 · GLM-5 $1.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3BQwen3.6 27B 262,144 · Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 262,144 · GLM-5 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3BQwen3.6 27B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · GLM-5: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 74 | 70 | 73 |
| Price | 25% | 44 | 62 | 41 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 68/100 | 55/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.6 27BAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) | GLM-5Z.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 146.5 (best) | 143.9 | 145.8 |
| ECI rank | #68 of 148 (best) | #83 of 148 | #74 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 85.9% | 84.9% | 87.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 35.1% (best) | 20.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 91.1% (best) | 86.7% | 80.0% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | — | 72.1% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.248 (best) | $1.00 |
| Output | $3.60 | $1.49 (best) | $3.20 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35 | $0.557 (best) | $1.55 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3.6-27b | qwen3.6-35b-a3b | glm-5 |
| API providers | 27 | 34 (best) | 27 |
| Released | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 17, 2026 | Feb 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.6 27B$13.20
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B$5.45
- GLM-5$16.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.6 27B, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B or GLM-5?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 68/100, Qwen3.6 27B 65/100, GLM-5 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.6 27B for raw capability and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B or GLM-5?
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.248 input / $1.49 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.60 input / $3.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); GLM-5 costs $1.00 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.557 per million tokens for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B versus $1.35 for Qwen3.6 27B (2.4× as much) and $1.55 for GLM-5 (2.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 27B 146.5 (#68 of 148), GLM-5 145.8 (#74 of 148) and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 143.9 (#83 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (144.2–147.9 vs 143.9–147.7), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GLM-5 87.8%, Qwen3.6 27B 85.9%, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 84.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.6 27B 91.1%, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 86.7%, GLM-5 80.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.6 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 204,800 for GLM-5. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.6 27B up to 65,536, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B up to 65,536, GLM-5 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.6 27B accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen3.6 35B-A3B accepts text, images, audio and video; GLM-5 accepts text. Qwen3.6 27B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.6 27B is the newest, released Apr 22, 2026. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B came out Apr 17, 2026; GLM-5 came out Feb 12, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3.6 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
- Qwen3.6 27B vs Grok 4.3xAI · ECI 149.2
- Qwen3.6 27B vs Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · ECI 148.0
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · ECI 145.9
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B vs GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI · ECI 145.8
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle · ECI 145.1
