Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Laguna XS 2.1
Laguna XS 2.1 comes out ahead, 68 to 56 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
56/100- ECI146.7
- Price$0.60 / $3.60
- Context262K
- Our pick
PoolsideLaguna XS 2.1
68/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.12
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Laguna XS 2.1 is our pick
Laguna XS 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (56). It leads on price. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna XS 2.1Laguna XS 2.1 $0.075 · Qwen3.5 397B-A17B $1.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.5 397B-A17B 262,144 · Laguna XS 2.1 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 397B-A17BQwen3.5 397B-A17B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Laguna XS 2.1: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Laguna XS 2.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 44 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 68/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.5 397B-A17BAlibaba (Qwen) | Laguna XS 2.1Poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 146.7 | — |
| ECI rank | #67 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 86.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 31.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 88.9% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.06 (best) |
| Output | $3.60 | $0.12 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35 | $0.075 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3.5-397b-a17b | poolside/laguna-xs-2.1 |
| API providers | 23 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Feb 15, 2026 | Jul 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B$13.20
- Laguna XS 2.1$0.84
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Laguna XS 2.1?
Laguna XS 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (56). It leads on price. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Laguna XS 2.1?
Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Poolside). Qwen3.5 397B-A17B costs $0.60 input / $3.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Laguna XS 2.1 versus $1.35 for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (18× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has an ECI of 146.7 and Laguna XS 2.1 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Laguna XS 2.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Laguna XS 2.1 share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 397B-A17B up to 65,536, Laguna XS 2.1 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B accepts text, images, audio and video; Laguna XS 2.1 accepts text. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Laguna XS 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 2, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B came out Feb 15, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-5Three-way comparison
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs GLM-5Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 145.8
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · ECI 148.0
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B ITGoogle
