ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5 27B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 63, Qwen3.5 27B 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI142.5
    • Price$0.25 / $2.00
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 27B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $2.40
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.5 27B

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 63/100, Qwen3.5 27B 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3.5 35B-A3B $0.688 · Qwen3.5 27B $0.825 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.5 35B-A3B 262,144 · Qwen3.5 27B 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen3.5 27B: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3.5 27B
Price50%5854
Inputs & features30%9090
Context window20%3737
Overall100%63/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.5 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 27BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)142.5—
ECI rank#88 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions83.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics70.0%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.30
Output$2.00 (best)$2.40
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.688 (best)$0.825
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioYesYes
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model IDqwen3.5-35b-a3bqwen3.5-27b
API providers18 (best)16
ReleasedFeb 23, 2026Feb 23, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B$6.50
  • Qwen3.5 27B$7.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Qwen3.5 27B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 63/100, Qwen3.5 27B 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.30 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B versus $0.825 for Qwen3.5 27B (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has an ECI of 142.5 and Qwen3.5 27B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Qwen3.5 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Qwen3.5 27B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B up to 65,536, Qwen3.5 27B up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen3.5 27B accepts text, images, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the newest, released Feb 23, 2026. Qwen3.5 27B came out Feb 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons