Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.7
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 70 to 66 and 56 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is 19% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
66/100- ECI142.5
- Price$0.25 / $2.00
- Context262K
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
70/100- ECI145.1
- Price$0.30 / $2.50
- Context1.05M
Z.ai (Zhipu)
GLM-4.7
56/100- ECI143.5
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B (66) and GLM-4.7 (56). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3.5 Flash LiteCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 145.1 · GLM-4.7 143.5 · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 142.5
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3.5 35B-A3B $0.688 · Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.85 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 262,144 · GLM-4.7 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3.5 35B-A3B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GLM-4.7: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.5 35B-A3B and GLM-4.7Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 69 | 72 | 70 |
| Price | 25% | 58 | 53 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 100 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 61 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 70/100 | 56/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.5 | 145.1 (best) | 143.5 |
| ECI rank | #88 of 148 | #79 of 148 (best) | #84 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 83.5% (best) | 83.3% | 83.3% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 26.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 70.0% | 71.1% | 83.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 32.2% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.00 (best) | $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Cached input | — | $0.03 (best) | $0.11 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.688 (best) | $0.85 | $1.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Google API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3.5-35b-a3b | gemini-3.5-flash-lite | glm-4.7 |
| API providers | 18 | 26 (best) | 20 |
| Released | Feb 23, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Mar 2026 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B$6.50
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$8.00
GLM-4.7$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B (66) and GLM-4.7 (56). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price); GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B versus $0.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (1.2× as much) and $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 145.1 (#79 of 148), GLM-4.7 143.5 (#84 of 148) and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 142.5 (#88 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (142.5–146.7 vs 141.3–145.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 83.5%, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 83.3%, GLM-4.7 83.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GLM-4.7 83.3%, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 71.1%, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 70.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and 204,800 for GLM-4.7. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B up to 65,536, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite up to 65,536, GLM-4.7 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts text, images, audio and video; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GLM-4.7 accepts text. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and GLM-4.7 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B came out Feb 23, 2026; GLM-4.7 came out Dec 22, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Mar 2026, GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.