Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B comes out ahead, 58 to 52 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $3.20
- Context262K
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.5-Preview
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is our pick
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52). It leads on price and inputs & features. LongCat-2.5-Preview wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLongCat-2.5-PreviewLongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | LongCat-2.5-Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 48 | 44 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 52/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen) | LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.40 (best) | $0.75 |
| Output | $3.20 | $2.95 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.10 (best) | $1.30 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.5-122b-a10b | — |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Feb 23, 2026 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
- LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or LongCat-2.5-Preview?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52). It leads on price and inputs & features. LongCat-2.5-Preview wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or LongCat-2.5-Preview?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is cheaper at $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.10 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and LongCat-2.5-Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
LongCat-2.5-Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedThree-way comparison
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Grok Build 0.1xAI
- LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Step 5 PreviewStepFun
- LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Hy4 previewTencent
