ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Claude Sonnet 3.7

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51, Claude Sonnet 3.7 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI139.4
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 235B-A22B

  2. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 3.7

    Released Feb 19, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI141.2
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context200K
    Full specs Remove Claude Sonnet 3.7

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100, Claude Sonnet 3.7 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 3.7 for raw capability and Qwen3 235B-A22B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityClaude Sonnet 3.7Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 3.7 141.2 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4
  • Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22BQwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 · Claude Sonnet 3.7 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextClaude Sonnet 3.7Claude Sonnet 3.7 200,000 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsClaude Sonnet 3.7Qwen3 235B-A22B: Text · Claude Sonnet 3.7: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 235B-A22BClaude Sonnet 3.7
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%6567
Price25%4613
Inputs & features15%3570
Context window10%2432
Overall100%51/10050/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Claude Sonnet 3.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen)Claude Sonnet 3.7Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)139.4141.2 (best)
ECI rank#103 of 148#96 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions70.7%79.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—57.8%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—61.0%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70 (best)$3.00
Output$2.80 (best)$15.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$1.23 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens64,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDqwen3-235b-a22b—
API providers7 (best)3
ReleasedApr 28, 2025Feb 19, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Oct 31, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
  • Claude Sonnet 3.7$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B or Claude Sonnet 3.7?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100, Claude Sonnet 3.7 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 3.7 for raw capability and Qwen3 235B-A22B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B or Claude Sonnet 3.7?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Sonnet 3.7 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.23 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B versus $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 3.7 (4.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 3.7 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 3.7 141.2 (#96 of 148) and Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 (#103 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (138.7–142.9 vs 135.2–140.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Claude Sonnet 3.7 79.7%, Qwen3 235B-A22B 70.7%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Sonnet 3.7 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 3.7 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 235B-A22B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384, Claude Sonnet 3.7 up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text; Claude Sonnet 3.7 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Sonnet 3.7 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 235B-A22B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Sonnet 3.7 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. Claude Sonnet 3.7 came out Feb 19, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025, Claude Sonnet 3.7 Oct 31, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons