ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash vs DeepSeek-R1

Gemini 2.5 Flash comes out ahead, 68 to 51 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI139.4
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 235B-A22B
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Flash

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    68/100
    • ECI140.8
    • Price$0.30 / $2.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.5 Flash

  3. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI139.0
    • Price$0.70 / $2.60
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove DeepSeek-R1
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Flash is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B (51) and DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 2.5 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash 140.8 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 · DeepSeek-R1 139.0
  • Lowest priceGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash $0.85 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.18 · Qwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash 1,048,576 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 235B-A22B: Text · Gemini 2.5 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · DeepSeek-R1: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22B and DeepSeek-R1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 235B-A22BGemini 2.5 FlashDeepSeek-R1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%656764
Price25%465347
Inputs & features15%3510035
Context window10%246124
Overall100%51/10068/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash vs DeepSeek-R1 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen)Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)139.4140.8 (best)139.0
ECI rank#103 of 148#97 of 148 (best)#104 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions70.7%—71.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics——53.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$0.30 (best)$0.70
Output$2.80$2.50 (best)$2.60
Cached input—$0.03—
Blended (3:1)$1.23$0.85 (best)$1.18
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Google APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDqwen3-235b-a22bgemini-2.5-flash—
API providers722 (best)12
ReleasedApr 28, 2025Jun 17, 2025Jan 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Jan 2025Jul 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash$8.00
  • DeepSeek-R1$12.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B, Gemini 2.5 Flash or DeepSeek-R1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B (51) and DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B, Gemini 2.5 Flash or DeepSeek-R1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $2.60 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); Qwen3 235B-A22B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.85 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash versus $1.18 for DeepSeek-R1 (1.4× as much) and $1.23 for Qwen3 235B-A22B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash 140.8 (#97 of 148), Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 (#103 of 148) and DeepSeek-R1 139.0 (#104 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (138.5–142.3 vs 135.2–140.8), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B, Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek-R1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.5 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 235B-A22B and 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384, Gemini 2.5 Flash up to 65,536, DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; DeepSeek-R1 accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 235B-A22B and DeepSeek-R1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Qwen3 235B-A22B came out Apr 28, 2025; DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025, Gemini 2.5 Flash Jan 2025, DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons