Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs Palmyra X5
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 comes out ahead, 52 to 48 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
52/100- ECI138.9
- Price$0.15 / $0.75
- Context262K
Writer
Palmyra X5
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $6.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is our pick
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Palmyra X5 (48). It leads on price. Palmyra X5 wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 $0.30 · Palmyra X5 $1.95 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextPalmyra X5Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsPalmyra X5Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507: Text · Palmyra X5: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 | Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 75 | 36 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Alibaba (Qwen) | Palmyra X5Writer |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 138.9 | — |
| ECI rank | #105 of 148 | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $0.75 (best) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.30 (best) | $1.95 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 11 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 11 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 21, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507$3.00
- Palmyra X5$18.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 or Palmyra X5?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Palmyra X5 (48). It leads on price. Palmyra X5 wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 or Palmyra X5?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.30 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 versus $1.95 for Palmyra X5 (6.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 has an ECI of 138.9 and Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 and Palmyra X5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Palmyra X5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 up to 16,384, Palmyra X5 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 accepts text; Palmyra X5 accepts text and images. Palmyra X5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Palmyra X5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2025. Palmyra X5 came out Apr 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT OSS 120BThree-way comparison
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs GPT OSS 120BOpenAI · ECI 140.0
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs DeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek · ECI 139.9
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.8
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.2
- Palmyra X5 vs QVQ MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
- Palmyra X5 vs Magistral MediumMistral AI
