Qwen3 14B vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 14B 54, DeepSeek V3 0324 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 14B
54/100- ECI138.2
- Price$0.35 / $1.40
- Context131K
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3 0324
54/100- ECI135.9
- Price$0.24 / $0.90
- Context164K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 14B 54/100, DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 14B for raw capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 on price and DeepSeek V3 0324 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 14BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 14B 138.2 · DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9
- Lowest priceDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.405 · Qwen3 14B $0.613 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 · Qwen3 14B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3 14B: Text · DeepSeek V3 0324: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 14B | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 63 | 60 |
| Price | 25% | 60 | 68 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 28 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 54/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 14BAlibaba (Qwen) | DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 138.2 (best) | 135.9 |
| ECI rank | #107 of 148 (best) | #114 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 63.8% | 67.6% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.4% (best) | 37.8% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.35 | $0.24 (best) |
| Output | $1.40 | $0.90 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.613 | $0.405 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 163,840 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 163,840 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3-14b | — |
| API providers | 1 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Apr 29, 2025 | Mar 24, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 14B$6.30
- DeepSeek V3 0324$4.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 14B or DeepSeek V3 0324?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 14B 54/100, DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 14B for raw capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 on price and DeepSeek V3 0324 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or DeepSeek V3 0324?
DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.24 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Qwen3 14B costs $0.35 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.405 per million tokens for DeepSeek V3 0324 versus $0.613 for Qwen3 14B (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 14B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 14B 138.2 (#107 of 148) and DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#114 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (133.5–140.1 vs 132.4–138.0), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, Qwen3 14B 63.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 14B 66.4%, DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 14B and DeepSeek V3 0324 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 14B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3 0324 has the largest context window at 163,840 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 14B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 14B up to 8,192, DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 14B accepts text; DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 14B is the newest, released Apr 29, 2025. DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 14B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add DeepSeek-V3.1Three-way comparison
- Qwen3 14B vs DeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek · ECI 139.9
- Qwen3 14B vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 135.0
- Qwen3 14B vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.8
- Qwen3 14B vs Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI · ECI 134.1
- DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Qwen3 8BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 135.0
