Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Vision Medium
Vision Medium comes out ahead, 84 to 40 on our weighted score.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
40/100- ECI—
- Price$0.35 / $1.05
- Context131K
- Our pick
VisparkVision Medium
84/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Vision Medium is our pick
Vision Medium is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (40). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen2.5-VL 7B InstructQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Vision Medium unpriced
- Longest contextVision MediumVision Medium 1,000,000 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsVision MediumQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct: Text, Images · Vision Medium: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingQwen2.5-VL 7B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct | Vision Medium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 50 | 100 |
| Context window | 40% | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 40/100 | 84/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Vision MediumVispark |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.35 | — |
| Output | $1.05 | — |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen2-5-vl-7b-instruct | — |
| API providers | 1 | — |
| Released | Sep 2024 | May 15, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct$5.60
- Vision Medium—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct or Vision Medium?
Vision Medium is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (40). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct or Vision Medium?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.35 input / $1.05 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct versus . Vision Medium has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has not been scored yet and Vision Medium has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct and Vision Medium yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Medium has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Vision Medium up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct accepts text and images; Vision Medium accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Vision Medium handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Vision Medium is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the newest, released Sep 2024. Vision Medium came out May 15, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add CodestralThree-way comparison
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs CodestralMistral AI
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Aya Expanse 32BCohere
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIA
- Vision Medium vs CodestralMistral AI
- Vision Medium vs solar-miniUpstage
