Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Codestral
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct comes out ahead, 51 to 48 and 36 on our weighted score, though Codestral is 14% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.35 / $1.05
- Context131K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.40
- Context8K
Mistral AICodestral
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context256K
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is our pick
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Codestral (48) and Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (36). It leads on inputs & features. Codestral wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCodestralCodestral $0.45 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct $0.525 · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) $0.725 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCodestralCodestral 256,000 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct 131,072 · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen2.5-VL 7B InstructQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct: Text, Images · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese): Text · Codestral: Text
- Self-hostingQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct and CodestralPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct | Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) | Codestral |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 63 | 57 | 66 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 0 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 36/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)Alibaba (Qwen) | CodestralMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.35 | $0.50 | $0.30 (best) |
| Output | $1.05 | $1.40 | $0.90 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.03 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 | $0.725 | $0.45 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 512 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen2-5-vl-7b-instruct | qwen-plus-character-ja | codestral-latest |
| API providers | 1 | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Sep 2024 | Jan 2024 | May 29, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Apr 2024 | Oct 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct$5.60
- Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)$7.80
- Codestral$4.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Codestral?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Codestral (48) and Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (36). It leads on inputs & features. Codestral wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Codestral?
Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct costs $0.35 input / $1.05 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) costs $0.50 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Codestral versus $0.525 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (1.2× as much) and $0.725 for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has not been scored yet, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) has not been scored yet and Codestral has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) and Codestral yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Codestral has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct and 8,192 for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese). Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) up to 512, Codestral up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct accepts text and images; Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) accepts text; Codestral accepts text. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct and Codestral publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the newest, released Sep 2024. Codestral came out May 29, 2024; Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) came out Jan 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Apr 2024, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) Apr 2024, Codestral Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Aya Expanse 32BCohere
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
- Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIA
- Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs SonarPerplexity
- Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Aya Expanse 32BCohere
- Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Vision LargeVispark
