ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Codestral vs Aya Expanse 32B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Codestral 48, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 45, Aya Expanse 32B 33). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

    Released Nov 12, 2024

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.43 / $0.60
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Codestral

    Released May 29, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $0.90
    • Context256K
  3. Cohere

    Aya Expanse 32B

    Released Oct 24, 2024

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Codestral 48/100, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 45/100, Aya Expanse 32B 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Codestral on price and Codestral for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCodestralCodestral $0.45 · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct $0.473 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextCodestralCodestral 256,000 · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct: Text · Codestral: Text · Aya Expanse 32B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructCodestralAya Expanse 32B
Price50%656656
Inputs & features30%25250
Context window20%243624
Overall100%45/10048/10033/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Codestral vs Aya Expanse 32B specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructAlibaba (Qwen)CodestralMistral AIAya Expanse 32BCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.43$0.30 (best)$0.50
Output$0.60 (best)$0.90$1.50
Cached input—$0.03—
Blended (3:1)$0.473$0.45 (best)$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens (best)4,096 tokens4,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0
API model ID—codestral-latestc4ai-aya-expanse-32b
API providers4 (best)32
ReleasedNov 12, 2024May 29, 2024Oct 24, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Oct 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct$5.50
  • Codestral$4.80
  • Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Codestral or Aya Expanse 32B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Codestral 48/100, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 45/100, Aya Expanse 32B 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Codestral on price and Codestral for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Codestral or Aya Expanse 32B?

Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct costs $0.43 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Codestral versus $0.473 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (1.1× as much) and $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has not been scored yet, Codestral has not been scored yet and Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Codestral and Aya Expanse 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct up to 8,192, Codestral up to 4,096, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct accepts text; Codestral accepts text; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is the newest, released Nov 12, 2024. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024; Codestral came out May 29, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Codestral Oct 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.