ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Ministral 3B vs Mistral Nemo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 3B 49, Mistral Nemo 48, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 44). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

    Released Sep 19, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.175 / $0.70
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3B

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    49/100
    • ECI118.1
    • Price$0.10 / $0.10
    • Context128K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Nemo

    Released Jul 1, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI118.7
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Ministral 3B 49/100, Mistral Nemo 48/100, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability, Ministral 3B on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMistral NemoCapabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Nemo 118.7 · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 118.5 · Ministral 3B 118.1
  • Lowest priceMinistral 3BMinistral 3B $0.10 · Mistral Nemo $0.15 · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.306 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct 131,072 · Ministral 3B 128,000 · Mistral Nemo 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen2.5 7B Instruct: Text · Ministral 3B: Text · Mistral Nemo: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen2.5 7B InstructMinistral 3BMistral Nemo
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%383839
Price25%749789
Inputs & features15%252525
Context window10%242424
Overall100%44/10049/10048/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Ministral 3B vs Mistral Nemo specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Ministral 3BMistral AIMistral NemoMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)118.5118.1118.7 (best)
ECI rank#141 of 148#144 of 148#140 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions35.5% (best)25.3%29.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics2.5%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.175$0.10 (best)$0.15
Output$0.70$0.10 (best)$0.15
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.306$0.10 (best)$0.15
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 1 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDqwen2-5-7b-instruct—mistral-nemo
API providers115 (best)
ReleasedSep 19, 2024Oct 16, 2024Jul 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024Mar 2024Jul 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$3.15
  • Ministral 3B$1.20
  • Mistral Nemo$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Ministral 3B or Mistral Nemo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Ministral 3B 49/100, Mistral Nemo 48/100, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability, Ministral 3B on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Ministral 3B or Mistral Nemo?

Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Nemo costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.175 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.10 per million tokens for Ministral 3B versus $0.15 for Mistral Nemo (1.5× as much) and $0.306 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (3.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Mistral Nemo scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Nemo 118.7 (#140 of 148), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 118.5 (#141 of 148) and Ministral 3B 118.1 (#144 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (111.3–121.5 vs 110.7–121.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 35.5%, Mistral Nemo 29.9%, Ministral 3B 25.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Ministral 3B and Mistral Nemo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Nemo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Ministral 3B and 128,000 for Mistral Nemo. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Ministral 3B up to 8,192, Mistral Nemo up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts text; Ministral 3B accepts text; Mistral Nemo accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Ministral 3B is the newest, released Oct 16, 2024. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct came out Sep 19, 2024; Mistral Nemo came out Jul 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Apr 2024, Ministral 3B Mar 2024, Mistral Nemo Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.