Qwen-VL OCR vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Aya Expanse 32B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B comes out ahead, 65 to 36 and 33 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL OCR
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context34K
- Our pick
NVIDIALlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context128K
CohereAya Expanse 32B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is our pick
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Qwen-VL OCR (36) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B Free · Qwen-VL OCR $0.72 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Aya Expanse 32BLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 128,000 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRQwen-VL OCR: Text, Images · Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B: Text · Aya Expanse 32B: Text
- Self-hostingLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Aya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen-VL OCR | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 57 | 100 | 56 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 35 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 1 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 65/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen) | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIA | Aya Expanse 32BCohere |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.72 | Free (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $0.72 | Free (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.72 | Free (best) | $0.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Nvidia API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 34,096 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 |
| API model ID | qwen-vl-ocr | nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b |
| API providers | 1 | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Oct 28, 2024 | Apr 7, 2025 | Oct 24, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen-VL OCR$8.64
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BFree
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen-VL OCR, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or Aya Expanse 32B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Qwen-VL OCR (36) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen-VL OCR, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or Aya Expanse 32B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Qwen-VL OCR costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B has not been scored yet and Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen-VL OCR, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Aya Expanse 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-VL OCR and Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Aya Expanse 32B have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR. Maximum output per response: Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B up to 8,192, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images; Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B accepts text; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the newest, released Apr 7, 2025. Qwen-VL OCR came out Oct 28, 2024; Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
