Qwen-VL Max vs Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Sonar
Qwen-VL Max comes out ahead, 41 to 30 and 27 on our weighted score, though Sonar is 29% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL Max
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $3.20
- Context131K
PerplexitySonar Reasoning Pro
27/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context128K
- Perplexity
Sonar
30/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $1.00
- Context128K
Qwen-VL Max is our pick
Qwen-VL Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Sonar (30) and Sonar Reasoning Pro (27). It leads on inputs & features. Sonar wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSonarSonar $1.00 · Qwen-VL Max $1.40 · Sonar Reasoning Pro $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen-VL MaxQwen-VL Max 131,072 · Sonar Reasoning Pro 128,000 · Sonar 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL Max and Sonar Reasoning ProQwen-VL Max: Text, Images · Sonar Reasoning Pro: Text, Images · Sonar: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen-VL Max | Sonar Reasoning Pro | Sonar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 43 | 24 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 35 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 27/100 | 30/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen-VL MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity | SonarPerplexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.80 (best) | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Output | $3.20 | $8.00 | $1.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.40 | $3.50 | $1.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Perplexity API | Official Perplexity API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen-vl-max | sonar-reasoning-pro | sonar |
| API providers | 3 | 4 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Apr 8, 2024 | Jan 1, 2024 | Jan 1, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Sep 1, 2025 | Sep 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen-VL Max$14.40
- Sonar Reasoning Pro$36.00
- Sonar$12.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen-VL Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Sonar?
Qwen-VL Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Sonar (30) and Sonar Reasoning Pro (27). It leads on inputs & features. Sonar wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen-VL Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Sonar?
Sonar is cheaper at $1.00 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price). Qwen-VL Max costs $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for Sonar versus $1.40 for Qwen-VL Max (1.4× as much) and $3.50 for Sonar Reasoning Pro (3.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen-VL Max has not been scored yet, Sonar Reasoning Pro has not been scored yet and Sonar has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen-VL Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro and Sonar yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sonar Reasoning Pro and Sonar does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen-VL Max has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Sonar Reasoning Pro and 128,000 for Sonar. Maximum output per response: Qwen-VL Max up to 8,192, Sonar Reasoning Pro up to 4,096, Sonar up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen-VL Max accepts text and images; Sonar Reasoning Pro accepts text and images; Sonar accepts text. Qwen-VL Max handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen-VL Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro and Sonar are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen-VL Max is the newest, released Apr 8, 2024. Sonar Reasoning Pro came out Jan 1, 2024; Sonar came out Jan 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen-VL Max Apr 2024, Sonar Reasoning Pro Sep 1, 2025, Sonar Sep 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
