Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus comes out ahead, 53 to 36 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.40
- Context8K
- Our pickAlibaba (Qwen)
Qwen Plus
53/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $1.20
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen Plus is our pick
Qwen Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (36). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen PlusQwen Plus $0.60 · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) $0.725 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen PlusQwen Plus 1,000,000 · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen Plus Character (Japanese): Text · Qwen Plus: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 57 | 60 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 53/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)Alibaba (Qwen) | Qwen PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.50 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $1.40 | $1.20 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.725 | $0.60 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 512 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen-plus-character-ja | qwen-plus |
| API providers | 1 | 9 (best) |
| Released | Jan 2024 | Jan 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)$7.80
- Qwen Plus$6.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (36). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) costs $0.50 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.60 per million tokens for Qwen Plus versus $0.725 for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) has not been scored yet and Qwen Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) and Qwen Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 8,192 for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese). Maximum output per response: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) up to 512, Qwen Plus up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) accepts text; Qwen Plus accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) and Qwen Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen Plus is the newest, released Jan 25, 2024. Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) came out Jan 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) Apr 2024, Qwen Plus Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
