Qwen-MT Turbo vs Step 1 (32K) vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct comes out ahead, 58 to 40 and 18 on our weighted score, though Qwen-MT Turbo is 12% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-MT Turbo
40/100- ECI—
- Price$0.16 / $0.49
- Context16K
StepFunStep 1 (32K)
18/100- ECI—
- Price$2.05 / $9.59
- Context33K
- Our pick
MetaLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.197 / $0.51
- Context128K
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is our pick
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen-MT Turbo (40) and Step 1 (32K) (18). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen-MT Turbo wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen-MT TurboQwen-MT Turbo $0.242 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.275 · Step 1 (32K) $3.94 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 · Step 1 (32K) 32,768 · Qwen-MT Turbo 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructQwen-MT Turbo: Text · Step 1 (32K): Text · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen-MT Turbo | Step 1 (32K) | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 79 | 22 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 25 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 40/100 | 18/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen-MT TurboAlibaba (Qwen) | Step 1 (32K)StepFun | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.16 (best) | $2.05 | $0.197 |
| Output | $0.49 (best) | $9.59 | $0.51 |
| Cached input | — | $0.41 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.242 (best) | $3.94 | $0.275 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official StepFun (Global) API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,384 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen-mt-turbo | step-1-32k | — |
| API providers | 1 | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Jan 1, 2025 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Jun 2024 | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen-MT Turbo$2.58
- Step 1 (32K)$39.68
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$2.99
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen-MT Turbo, Step 1 (32K) or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen-MT Turbo (40) and Step 1 (32K) (18). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen-MT Turbo wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen-MT Turbo, Step 1 (32K) or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?
Qwen-MT Turbo is cheaper at $0.16 input / $0.49 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.197 input / $0.51 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Step 1 (32K) costs $2.05 input / $9.59 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.242 per million tokens for Qwen-MT Turbo versus $0.275 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1.1× as much) and $3.94 for Step 1 (32K) (16× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen-MT Turbo has not been scored yet, Step 1 (32K) has not been scored yet and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen-MT Turbo, Step 1 (32K) and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-MT Turbo does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Step 1 (32K) and 16,384 for Qwen-MT Turbo. Maximum output per response: Qwen-MT Turbo up to 8,192, Step 1 (32K) up to 32,768, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen-MT Turbo accepts text; Step 1 (32K) accepts text; Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen-MT Turbo and Step 1 (32K) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen-MT Turbo is the newest, released Jan 2025. Step 1 (32K) came out Jan 1, 2025; Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen-MT Turbo Apr 2024, Step 1 (32K) Jun 2024, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
