Qwen Flash vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini
Qwen Flash comes out ahead, 68 to 59 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen Flash
68/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.40
- Context1M
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex mini
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $2.00
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen Flash is our pick
Qwen Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GPT-5.1 Codex mini (59). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.1 Codex mini wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen FlashQwen Flash $0.138 · GPT-5.1 Codex mini $0.688 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen FlashQwen Flash 1,000,000 · GPT-5.1 Codex mini 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.1 Codex miniQwen Flash: Text · GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen Flash | GPT-5.1 Codex mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 91 | 58 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen) | GPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $2.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.138 (best) | $0.688 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 10 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen-flash | — |
| API providers | 6 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | Nov 13, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen Flash$1.30
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini$6.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen Flash or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?
Qwen Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GPT-5.1 Codex mini (59). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.1 Codex mini wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Flash or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?
Qwen Flash is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-5.1 Codex mini costs $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.138 per million tokens for Qwen Flash versus $0.688 for GPT-5.1 Codex mini (5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen Flash has not been scored yet and GPT-5.1 Codex mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen Flash and GPT-5.1 Codex mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.1 Codex mini. Maximum output per response: Qwen Flash up to 32,768, GPT-5.1 Codex mini up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen Flash accepts text; GPT-5.1 Codex mini accepts text and images. GPT-5.1 Codex mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen Flash and GPT-5.1 Codex mini are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the newest, released Nov 13, 2025. Qwen Flash came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Flash Apr 2024, GPT-5.1 Codex mini Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Voxtral Small 24B 2507Three-way comparison
- Qwen Flash vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
- Qwen Flash vs Apertus 8BSwiss AI
- Qwen Flash vs Granite-4.0-H-SmallIBM
- Qwen Flash vs Sarvam 105BSarvam AI
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
