ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

QVQ Max vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs Palmyra X5

Palmyra X5 comes out ahead, 48 to 40 and 34 on our weighted score.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QVQ Max

    Released Mar 25, 2025

    40/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.80
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

    Released Sep 2025

    34/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $6.00
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Writer

    Palmyra X5

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $6.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Palmyra X5 is our pick

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against QVQ Max (40) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $1.88 · Palmyra X5 $1.95 · QVQ Max $2.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextPalmyra X5Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · QVQ Max 131,072 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsQVQ Max and Palmyra X5QVQ Max: Text, Images · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Text · Palmyra X5: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQVQ MaxQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Palmyra X5
Price50%353736
Inputs & features30%603560
Context window20%242460
Overall100%40/10034/10048/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

QVQ Max vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs Palmyra X5 specifications side by side
SpecificationQVQ MaxAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen)Palmyra X5Writer
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.20$0.50 (best)$0.60
Output$4.80 (best)$6.00$6.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$2.10$1.88 (best)$1.95
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDqvq-maxqwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking—
API providers110 (best)1
ReleasedMar 25, 2025Sep 2025Apr 28, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024Apr 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • QVQ Max$21.60
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)$17.00
  • Palmyra X5$18.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: QVQ Max, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or Palmyra X5?

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against QVQ Max (40) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, QVQ Max, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or Palmyra X5?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is cheaper at $0.50 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); QVQ Max costs $1.20 input / $4.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.88 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) versus $1.95 for Palmyra X5 (1× as much) and $2.10 for QVQ Max (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. QVQ Max has not been scored yet, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has not been scored yet and Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for QVQ Max, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and Palmyra X5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Palmyra X5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for QVQ Max and 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking). Maximum output per response: QVQ Max up to 8,192, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) up to 32,768, Palmyra X5 up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

QVQ Max accepts text and images; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) accepts text; Palmyra X5 accepts text and images. QVQ Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; QVQ Max and Palmyra X5 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is the newest, released Sep 2025. Palmyra X5 came out Apr 28, 2025; QVQ Max came out Mar 25, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: QVQ Max Apr 2024, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.