ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Sonar Deep Research vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Pixtral Large (25.02) comes out ahead, 33 to 28 and 20 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
  2. Perplexity

    Sonar Deep Research

    Released Feb 1, 2025

    20/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Pixtral Large (25.02) is our pick

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Sonar Deep Research (20). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest pricePixtral Large (25.02) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Sonar Deep Research $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 · Sonar Deep Research 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral Large (25.02)Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Sonar Deep Research: Text · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPixtral Large (25.02)Sonar Deep ResearchQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%272427
Inputs & features30%501025
Context window20%242437
Overall100%33/10020/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Sonar Deep Research vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AISonar Deep ResearchPerplexityQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.00$1.50 (best)
Output$6.00 (best)$8.00$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00 (best)$3.50$3.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Perplexity APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · low · medium · highNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model ID—sonar-deep-researchqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers337 (best)
ReleasedApr 8, 2025Feb 1, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
  • Sonar Deep Research$36.00
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02), Sonar Deep Research or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Sonar Deep Research (20). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02), Sonar Deep Research or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Sonar Deep Research costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Pixtral Large (25.02) versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1× as much) and $3.50 for Sonar Deep Research (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet, Sonar Deep Research has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02), Sonar Deep Research and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sonar Deep Research does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02) and 128,000 for Sonar Deep Research. Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Sonar Deep Research up to 32,768, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Sonar Deep Research accepts text; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Pixtral Large (25.02) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Pixtral Large (25.02) and Sonar Deep Research is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the newest, released Apr 8, 2025. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025; Sonar Deep Research came out Feb 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Sonar Deep Research Jan 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.