ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B comes out ahead, 59 to 33 and 28 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B

    Released Apr 2025

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.80
    • Context131K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is our pick

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-VL 30B-A3B $0.35 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B 131,072 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral Large (25.02) and Qwen3-VL 30B-A3BPixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B: Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-VL 30B-A3B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPixtral Large (25.02)Qwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%277227
Inputs & features30%506025
Context window20%242437
Overall100%33/10059/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AIQwen3-VL 30B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.20 (best)$1.50
Output$6.00$0.80 (best)$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.35 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model ID—qwen3-vl-30b-a3bqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers317 (best)
ReleasedApr 8, 2025Apr 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
  • Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B$3.60
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02), Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02), Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.35 per million tokens for Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (8.6× as much) and $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (8.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02), Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B up to 32,768, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Pixtral Large (25.02) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the newest, released Apr 8, 2025. Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B came out Apr 2025; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Apr 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.