Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Palmyra X5
Palmyra X5 comes out ahead, 48 to 33 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
Writer
Palmyra X5
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $6.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Palmyra X5 is our pick
Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricePalmyra X5Palmyra X5 $1.95 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextPalmyra X5Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsPixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Palmyra X5: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Pixtral Large (25.02) | Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 36 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI | Palmyra X5Writer |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.60 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $1.95 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Apr 8, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
- Palmyra X5$18.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02) or Palmyra X5?
Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Palmyra X5?
Palmyra X5 is cheaper at $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.95 per million tokens for Palmyra X5 versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet and Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02) and Palmyra X5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Palmyra X5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Palmyra X5 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Palmyra X5 accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Pixtral Large (25.02) and Palmyra X5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Palmyra X5 is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructThree-way comparison
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Command ACohere
- Palmyra X5 vs QVQ MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
- Palmyra X5 vs Magistral MediumMistral AI
