Pixtral 12B vs Command R7B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Pixtral 12B 64, Command R7B 62). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIPixtral 12B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context128K
CohereCommand R7B
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.037 / $0.15
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Pixtral 12B 64/100, Command R7B 62/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R7B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand R7BCommand R7B $0.066 · Pixtral 12B $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the samePixtral 12B 128,000 · Command R7B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsPixtral 12BPixtral 12B: Text, Images · Command R7B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Pixtral 12B | Command R7B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Pixtral 12BMistral AI | Command R7BCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.037 (best) |
| Output | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.066 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | pixtral-12b | command-r7b-12-2024 |
| API providers | 4 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Sep 1, 2024 | Dec 2, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2024 | Jun 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Pixtral 12B$1.80
- Command R7B$0.675
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Pixtral 12B or Command R7B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Pixtral 12B 64/100, Command R7B 62/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R7B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Pixtral 12B or Command R7B?
Command R7B is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Pixtral 12B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B versus $0.15 for Pixtral 12B (2.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet and Command R7B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral 12B and Command R7B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Pixtral 12B and Command R7B share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Pixtral 12B up to 128,000, Command R7B up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Pixtral 12B accepts text and images; Command R7B accepts text. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Command R7B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2024. Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Pixtral 12B Sep 2024, Command R7B Jun 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
