ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Phi-4-mini vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Nova Lite

Nova Lite comes out ahead, 77 to 58 and 55 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Microsoft

    Phi-4-mini

    Released Dec 11, 2024

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.30
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context33K
  3. Our pick

    Amazon

    Nova Lite

    Released Dec 3, 2024

    77/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.06 / $0.24
    • Context300K
01 — Verdict

Nova Lite is our pick

Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Phi-4-mini (58) and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (55). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNova LiteNova Lite $0.105 · Phi-4-mini $0.131 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNova LiteNova Lite 300,000 · Phi-4-mini 128,000 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsNova LitePhi-4-mini: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Nova Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingPhi-4-mini and Voxtral Small 24B 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPhi-4-miniVoxtral Small 24B 2507Nova Lite
Price50%928996
Inputs & features30%253570
Context window20%24039
Overall100%58/10055/10077/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Phi-4-mini vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Nova Lite specifications side by side
SpecificationPhi-4-miniMicrosoftVoxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AINova LiteAmazon
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.075$0.10$0.06 (best)
Output$0.30$0.30$0.24 (best)
Cached input——$0.015
Blended (3:1)$0.131$0.15$0.105 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Azure APIOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Amazon Bedrock API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens32,768 tokens300,000 tokens (best)
Max output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens (best)10,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache 2.0Proprietary
API model IDphi-4-minivoxtral-small-latestamazon.nova-lite-v1:0
API providers17 (best)3
ReleasedDec 11, 2024Jul 15, 2025Dec 3, 2024
Knowledge cutoffOct 2023—Oct 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Phi-4-mini$1.35
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.60
  • Nova Lite$1.08
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Phi-4-mini, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Nova Lite?

Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Phi-4-mini (58) and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (55). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4-mini, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Nova Lite?

Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Phi-4-mini costs $0.075 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Azure API price); Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.105 per million tokens for Nova Lite versus $0.131 for Phi-4-mini (1.2× as much) and $0.15 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Phi-4-mini has not been scored yet, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Nova Lite has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Phi-4-mini, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Nova Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Lite has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Phi-4-mini and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Phi-4-mini up to 4,096, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Nova Lite up to 10,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Phi-4-mini accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Nova Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Nova Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Phi-4-mini and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Nova Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Phi-4-mini came out Dec 11, 2024; Nova Lite came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Phi-4-mini Oct 2023, Nova Lite Oct 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.