Ornith 1.0 31B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Muse Glimmer 30B 52, Ornith 1.0 31B 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.0 31B
51/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context262K
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Muse Glimmer 30B 52/100, Ornith 1.0 31B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Glimmer 30B on price and Ornith 1.0 31B for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMuse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Ornith 1.0 31B unpriced
- Longest contextOrnith 1.0 31BOrnith 1.0 31B 262,144 · Muse Glimmer 30B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsOrnith 1.0 31B: Text, Images · Muse Glimmer 30B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Ornith 1.0 31B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 60 | 70 |
| Context window | 40% | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 52/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ornith 1.0 31BDeepReinforce | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.30 |
| Output | — | $1.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 10 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | — | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenMIT | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | — | 12 |
| Released | Jun 25, 2026 | Aug 10, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 4, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ornith 1.0 31B—
- Muse Glimmer 30B$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ornith 1.0 31B or Muse Glimmer 30B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Muse Glimmer 30B 52/100, Ornith 1.0 31B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Glimmer 30B on price and Ornith 1.0 31B for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ornith 1.0 31B or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B versus . Ornith 1.0 31B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ornith 1.0 31B has not been scored yet and Muse Glimmer 30B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ornith 1.0 31B and Muse Glimmer 30B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ornith 1.0 31B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B. Maximum output per response: Muse Glimmer 30B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ornith 1.0 31B accepts text and images; Muse Glimmer 30B accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (MIT and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Muse Glimmer 30B is the newest, released Aug 10, 2026. Ornith 1.0 31B came out Jun 25, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Muse Glimmer 30B Jan 4, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
