Ornith 1.0 31B vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed comes out ahead, 63 to 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.0 31B
51/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context262K
- Our pick
Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
63/100- ECI—
- Price$1.90 / $8.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is our pick
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Ornith 1.0 31B (51). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Ornith 1.0 31B unpriced
- Longest contextAbout the sameOrnith 1.0 31B 262,144 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedOrnith 1.0 31B: Text, Images · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Ornith 1.0 31B | Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 40% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 63/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ornith 1.0 31BDeepReinforce | Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $1.90 |
| Output | — | $8.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $3.42 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 11 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | — | 262,144 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | — | 11 |
| Released | Jun 25, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ornith 1.0 31B—
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ornith 1.0 31B or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Ornith 1.0 31B (51). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ornith 1.0 31B or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is cheaper at $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.42 per million tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed versus . Ornith 1.0 31B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ornith 1.0 31B has not been scored yet and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ornith 1.0 31B and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ornith 1.0 31B and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ornith 1.0 31B accepts text and images; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Ornith 1.0 31B is the newest, released Jun 25, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed came out Jun 12, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Seed 2.1 ProThree-way comparison
- Ornith 1.0 31B vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- Ornith 1.0 31B vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
- Ornith 1.0 31B vs Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
- Ornith 1.0 31B vs FuguSakana AI
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Command A PlusCohere
