ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna comes out ahead, 78 to 64 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Anthropic

    Claude Opus 5.5

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI167.4
    • Price$4.00 / $20.00
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Claude Opus 5.5
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6 Luna

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    78/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove GPT-6 Luna

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-6 Luna is our pick

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Claude Opus 5.5 (64). It leads on price. Claude Opus 5.5 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityClaude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks: Claude Opus 5.5 88.5% · GPT-6 Luna 77.4%
  • Lowest priceGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Luna $0.20 · Claude Opus 5.5 $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Luna 1,050,000 · Claude Opus 5.5 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Opus 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-6 Luna: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%8977
Price25%783
Inputs & features15%8080
Context window10%6061
Overall100%64/10078/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna specifications side by side
SpecificationClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)167.4—
ECI rank#1 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.6% (best)90.5%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics91.2% (best)79.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100% (best)98.9%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions72.2% (best)41.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$4.00$0.10 (best)
Output$20.00$0.50 (best)
Cached input$0.20$0.01 (best)
Blended (3:1)$8.00$0.20 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $0.20 / $0.75
Price sourceOfficial Anthropic APIOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)
Max output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDclaude-opus-5-5gpt-6-luna
API providers28 (best)24
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJun 2026May 18, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Claude Opus 5.5$80.00
  • GPT-6 Luna$2.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Claude Opus 5.5 (64). It leads on price. Claude Opus 5.5 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for GPT-6 Luna versus $8.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 (40× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): Claude Opus 5.5 88.5% and GPT-6 Luna 77.4%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Claude Opus 5.5 90.6%, GPT-6 Luna 90.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Claude Opus 5.5 91.2%, GPT-6 Luna 79.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Opus 5.5 100%, GPT-6 Luna 98.9%; SimpleQA Verified — Claude Opus 5.5 72.2%, GPT-6 Luna 41.4%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Opus 5.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.5. Maximum output per response: Claude Opus 5.5 up to 128,000, GPT-6 Luna up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-6 Luna accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

No. Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. GPT-6 Luna came out Sep 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Opus 5.5 Jun 2026, GPT-6 Luna May 18, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons