Claude Opus 4.1 vs Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Pixtral Large (25.02) comes out ahead, 33 to 28 and 27 on our weighted score.
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1
27/100- ECI144.1
- Price$15.00 / $75.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
28/100- ECI—
- Price$1.50 / $7.50
- Context262K
Pixtral Large (25.02) is our pick
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Claude Opus 4.1 (27). Claude Opus 4.1 wins on inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricePixtral Large (25.02) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Claude Opus 4.1 $30.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Claude Opus 4.1 200,000 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Opus 4.1Claude Opus 4.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Opus 4.1 | Pixtral Large (25.02) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 0 | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 50 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 27/100 | 33/100 | 28/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 144.1 | — | — |
| ECI rank | #81 of 148 | — | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 77.3% | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 12.6% | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 68.9% | — | — |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 73.4% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $15.00 | $2.00 | $1.50 (best) |
| Output | $75.00 | $6.00 (best) | $7.50 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $30.00 | $3.00 (best) | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $2.70 / $13.50 |
| Price source | Median of 14 providers | Median of 3 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct |
| API providers | 14 (best) | 3 | 7 |
| Released | Aug 5, 2025 | Apr 8, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 31, 2025 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Opus 4.1$300.00
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.1, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Claude Opus 4.1 (27). Claude Opus 4.1 wins on inputs & features. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Pixtral Large (25.02) versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1× as much) and $30.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 (10× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Claude Opus 4.1 has an ECI of 144.1, Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.1 and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Claude Opus 4.1 up to 32,000, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Opus 4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Claude Opus 4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Opus 4.1 and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the newest, released Aug 5, 2025. Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Opus 4.1 Mar 31, 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs o3-proOpenAI · ECI 147.4
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek · ECI 137.4
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
