ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

o4-mini vs o4-mini-deep-research vs solar-mini

o4-mini comes out ahead, 55 to 49 and 15 on our weighted score, though solar-mini is 13× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    o4-mini

    Released Apr 16, 2025Deprecated

    55/100
    • ECI145.6
    • Price$1.10 / $4.40
    • Context200K
  2. OpenAI

    o4-mini-deep-research

    Released Jun 26, 2024

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context200K
  3. Upstage

    solar-mini

    Released Jun 12, 2024

    15/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

o4-mini is our pick

o4-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against o4-mini-deep-research (49) and solar-mini (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · o4-mini $1.93 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · o4-mini-deep-research unpriced
  • Longest contexto4-mini and o4-mini-deep-researcho4-mini 200,000 · o4-mini-deep-research 200,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputso4-mini and o4-mini-deep-researcho4-mini: Text, Images · o4-mini-deep-research: Text, Images · solar-mini: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto4-minio4-mini-deep-researchsolar-mini
Inputs & features60%706025
Context window40%32320
Overall100%55/10049/10015/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o4-mini vs o4-mini-deep-research vs solar-mini specifications side by side
Specificationo4-miniOpenAIo4-mini-deep-researchOpenAIsolar-miniUpstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)145.6——
ECI rank#76 of 148——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions79.6%——
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics36.1%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics81.7%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions19.6%——
Price per million tokens
Input$1.10—$0.15 (best)
Output$4.40—$0.15 (best)
Cached input$0.275——
Blended (3:1)$1.93—$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI API—Official Upstage API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)200,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens (best)100,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDo4-mini—solar-mini
API providers19 (best)—1
ReleasedApr 16, 2025Jun 26, 2024Jun 12, 2024
Knowledge cutoffMay 2024May 2024Sep 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o4-mini$19.80
  • o4-mini-deep-research—
  • solar-mini$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o4-mini, o4-mini-deep-research or solar-mini?

o4-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against o4-mini-deep-research (49) and solar-mini (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, o4-mini, o4-mini-deep-research or solar-mini?

solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). o4-mini costs $1.10 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $1.93 for o4-mini (13× as much). o4-mini-deep-research has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. o4-mini has an ECI of 145.6, o4-mini-deep-research has not been scored yet and solar-mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o4-mini, o4-mini-deep-research and solar-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

o4-mini and o4-mini-deep-research have the largest context windows (200,000 and 200,000 tokens), against 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: o4-mini up to 100,000, o4-mini-deep-research up to 100,000, solar-mini up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o4-mini accepts text and images; o4-mini-deep-research accepts text and images; solar-mini accepts text. o4-mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. o4-mini, o4-mini-deep-research and solar-mini are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

o4-mini is the newest, released Apr 16, 2025. o4-mini-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2024; solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: o4-mini May 2024, o4-mini-deep-research May 2024, solar-mini Sep 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.