ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

o3 vs DeepSeek-R1

o3 comes out ahead, 58 to 51 on our weighted score, though DeepSeek-R1 is 3× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    o3

    Released Apr 16, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI146.9
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context200K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI139.0
    • Price$0.70 / $2.60
    • Context128K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

o3 is our pick

o3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek-R1 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • Capabilityo3Capabilities Index (ECI): o3 146.9 · DeepSeek-R1 139.0
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek-R1 $1.18 · o3 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contexto3o3 200,000 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputso3o3: Text, Images, PDFs · DeepSeek-R1: Text
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek-R1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto3DeepSeek-R1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%7464
Price25%2447
Inputs & features15%8035
Context window10%3224
Overall100%58/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o3 vs DeepSeek-R1 specifications side by side
Specificationo3OpenAIDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)146.9 (best)139.0
ECI rank#63 of 148 (best)#104 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions81.8% (best)71.7%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics33.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics84.4% (best)53.3%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues62.3%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions49.4%—
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.70 (best)
Output$8.00$2.60 (best)
Cached input$0.50—
Blended (3:1)$3.50$1.18 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDo3—
API providers18 (best)12
ReleasedApr 16, 2025Jan 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2024Jul 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o3$36.00
  • DeepSeek-R1$12.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o3 or DeepSeek-R1?

o3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek-R1 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, o3 or DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.60 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). o3 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.18 per million tokens for DeepSeek-R1 versus $3.50 for o3 (3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

o3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): o3 146.9 (#63 of 148) and DeepSeek-R1 139.0 (#104 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (144.9–148.6 vs 136.2–140.4), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — o3 81.8%, DeepSeek-R1 71.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — o3 84.4%, DeepSeek-R1 53.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-R1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, o3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: o3 up to 100,000, DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o3 accepts text, images and PDFs; DeepSeek-R1 accepts text. o3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek-R1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; o3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

o3 is the newest, released Apr 16, 2025. DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3 May 2024, DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.