o3-pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3.6 Max Preview comes out ahead, 54 to 51 and 49 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIo3-pro
51/100- ECI147.4
- Price$20.00 / $80.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
54/100- ECI149.2
- Price$1.30 / $7.80
- Context262K
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1
49/100- ECI144.1
- Price$15.00 / $75.00
- Context200K
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is our pick
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against o3-pro (51) and Claude Opus 4.1 (49). It leads on capability, price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.6 Max PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 · o3-pro 147.4 · Claude Opus 4.1 144.1
- Lowest priceQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.6 Max Preview $2.92 · Claude Opus 4.1 $30.00 · o3-pro $35.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.6 Max Preview 262,144 · o3-pro 200,000 · Claude Opus 4.1 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Opus 4.1o3-pro: Text, Images · Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Text · Claude Opus 4.1: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Claude Opus 4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 75 | 77 | 71 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 54/100 | 49/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | o3-proOpenAI | Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 147.4 | 149.2 (best) | 144.1 |
| ECI rank | #60 of 148 | #54 of 148 (best) | #81 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 87.4% (best) | 77.3% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | — | 12.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 91.1% (best) | 68.9% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 76.7% (best) | 73.4% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 52.0% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $20.00 | $1.30 (best) | $15.00 |
| Output | $80.00 | $7.80 (best) | $75.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.13 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00 | $2.92 (best) | $30.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Alibaba API | Median of 14 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 100,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | o3-pro | qwen3.6-max-preview | — |
| API providers | 6 | 10 | 14 (best) |
| Released | Jun 10, 2025 | Apr 20, 2026 | Aug 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2024 | Apr 2025 | Mar 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- o3-pro$360.00
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview$28.60
- Claude Opus 4.1$300.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: o3-pro, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Claude Opus 4.1?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against o3-pro (51) and Claude Opus 4.1 (49). It leads on capability, price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Claude Opus 4.1?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.30 input / $7.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers); o3-pro costs $20.00 input / $80.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.92 per million tokens for Qwen3.6 Max Preview versus $30.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 (10× as much) and $35.00 for o3-pro (12× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 (#54 of 148), o3-pro 147.4 (#60 of 148) and Claude Opus 4.1 144.1 (#81 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.6–152.0 vs 145.8–149.7), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o3-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for o3-pro and 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.1. Maximum output per response: o3-pro up to 100,000, Qwen3.6 Max Preview up to 65,536, Claude Opus 4.1 up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
o3-pro accepts text and images; Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts text; Claude Opus 4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Opus 4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. o3-pro, Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Claude Opus 4.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the newest, released Apr 20, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1 came out Aug 5, 2025; o3-pro came out Jun 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3-pro May 2024, Qwen3.6 Max Preview Apr 2025, Claude Opus 4.1 Mar 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
