o3-pro vs Claude Opus 4
o3-pro comes out ahead, 51 to 48 on our weighted score, though Claude Opus 4 is 14% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
OpenAIo3-pro
51/100- ECI147.4
- Price$20.00 / $80.00
- Context200K
AnthropicClaude Opus 4
48/100- ECI142.7
- Price$15.00 / $75.00
- Context200K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
o3-pro is our pick
o3-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Claude Opus 4 (48). It leads on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- Capabilityo3-proCapabilities Index (ECI): o3-pro 147.4 · Claude Opus 4 142.7
- Lowest priceClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4 $30.00 · o3-pro $35.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameo3-pro 200,000 · Claude Opus 4 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Opus 4o3-pro: Text, Images · Claude Opus 4: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | o3-pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 75 | 69 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 48/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | o3-proOpenAI | Claude Opus 4Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 147.4 (best) | 142.7 |
| ECI rank | #60 of 148 (best) | #87 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 76.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 64.4% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 70.7% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $20.00 | $15.00 (best) |
| Output | $80.00 | $75.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00 | $30.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 100,000 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | o3-pro | — |
| API providers | 6 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Jun 10, 2025 | May 22, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2024 | Mar 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- o3-pro$360.00
- Claude Opus 4$300.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: o3-pro or Claude Opus 4?
o3-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Claude Opus 4 (48). It leads on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 is cheaper at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). o3-pro costs $20.00 input / $80.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $30.00 per million tokens for Claude Opus 4 versus $35.00 for o3-pro (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
o3-pro scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): o3-pro 147.4 (#60 of 148) and Claude Opus 4 142.7 (#87 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (145.8–149.7 vs 140.2–144.2), so the gap is a real one.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o3-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, o3-pro leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
o3-pro and Claude Opus 4 share the same 200,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: o3-pro up to 100,000, Claude Opus 4 up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
o3-pro accepts text and images; Claude Opus 4 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Opus 4 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. o3-pro and Claude Opus 4 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
o3-pro is the newest, released Jun 10, 2025. Claude Opus 4 came out May 22, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3-pro May 2024, Claude Opus 4 Mar 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Claude Opus 4.1Three-way comparison
- o3-pro vs Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic · ECI 144.1
- o3-pro vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- o3-pro vs InklingThinking Machines · ECI 148.6
- o3-pro vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek · ECI 137.4
- Claude Opus 4 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek · ECI 137.4
- Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
