o3-pro vs GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 comes out ahead, 57 to 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
GLM-5.1 is our pick
GLM-5.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against o3-pro (51). It leads on capability and price. o3-pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGLM-5.1Capabilities Index (ECI): GLM-5.1 149.9 · o3-pro 147.4
- Lowest priceGLM-5.1GLM-5.1 $2.15 · o3-pro $35.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameo3-pro 200,000 · GLM-5.1 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputso3-proo3-pro: Text, Images · GLM-5.1: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-5.1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | o3-pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 75 | 78 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 34 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 45 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 57/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification |  o3-proOpenAI |  GLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 147.4 | 149.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #60 of 148 | #51 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 89.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 36.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 93.3% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 74.2% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 34.0% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $20.00 | $1.40 (best) |
| Output | $80.00 | $4.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.26 |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00 | $2.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 100,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | o3-pro | glm-5.1 |
| API providers | 6 | 40 (best) |
| Released | Jun 10, 2025 | Apr 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- o3-pro$360.00
- GLM-5.1$22.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: o3-pro or GLM-5.1?
GLM-5.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against o3-pro (51). It leads on capability and price. o3-pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro or GLM-5.1?
GLM-5.1 is cheaper at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). o3-pro costs $20.00 input / $80.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.15 per million tokens for GLM-5.1 versus $35.00 for o3-pro (16× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GLM-5.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GLM-5.1 149.9 (#51 of 148) and o3-pro 147.4 (#60 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (148.0–151.6 vs 145.8–149.7), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o3-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GLM-5.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
o3-pro and GLM-5.1 share the same 200,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: o3-pro up to 100,000, GLM-5.1 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
o3-pro accepts text and images; GLM-5.1 accepts text. o3-pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-5.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; o3-pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-5.1 is the newest, released Apr 7, 2026. o3-pro came out Jun 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3-pro May 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Claude Opus 4.1Three-way comparison
- o3-pro vs Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic · ECI 144.1
- o3-pro vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- o3-pro vs InklingThinking Machines · ECI 148.6
- o3-pro vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek · ECI 137.4
- GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 149.2
