ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Nova Pro vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Nova Pro 48, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 46, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 43). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Amazon

    Nova Pro

    Released Dec 3, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI123.8
    • Price$0.80 / $3.20
    • Context300K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

    Released Dec 6, 2024

    46/100
    • ECI127.3
    • Price$0.59 / $0.724
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

    Released Sep 17, 2024

    43/100
    • ECI128.5
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nova Pro 48/100, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 46/100, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 32B Instruct for raw capability, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct on price and Nova Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen2.5 32B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 128.5 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3 · Nova Pro 123.8
  • Lowest priceLlama-3.3-70B-InstructLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct $0.624 · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct $1.23 · Nova Pro $1.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNova ProNova Pro 300,000 · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNova ProNova Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: Text · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNova ProLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%454951
Price25%436046
Inputs & features15%702525
Context window10%392424
Overall100%48/10046/10043/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nova Pro vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationNova ProAmazonLlama-3.3-70B-InstructMetaQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)123.8127.3128.5 (best)
ECI rank#137 of 148#133 of 148#131 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—47.4% (best)46.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—5.1%7.4% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.80$0.59 (best)$0.70
Output$3.20$0.724 (best)$2.80
Cached input$0.20——
Blended (3:1)$1.40$0.624 (best)$1.23
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Amazon Bedrock APIMedian of 21 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window300,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output10,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDamazon.nova-pro-v1:0llama-3.3-70b-instructqwen2-5-32b-instruct
API providers324 (best)1
ReleasedDec 3, 2024Dec 6, 2024Sep 17, 2024
Knowledge cutoffOct 2024Dec 2023Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nova Pro$14.40
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct$7.35
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct$12.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nova Pro, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nova Pro 48/100, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 46/100, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 32B Instruct for raw capability, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct on price and Nova Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.59 input / $0.724 output per million tokens (median across 21 API providers; free on Llama). Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Nova Pro costs $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.624 per million tokens for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct versus $1.23 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (2× as much) and $1.40 for Nova Pro (2.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 128.5 (#131 of 148), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3 (#133 of 148) and Nova Pro 123.8 (#137 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (123.5–130.0 vs 122.5–129.5), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova Pro, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Pro has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and 128,000 for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Nova Pro up to 10,000, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nova Pro accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct accepts text; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct accepts text. Nova Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Pro is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Dec 6, 2024. Nova Pro came out Dec 3, 2024; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct came out Sep 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Pro Oct 2024, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.