Nova Lite vs Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Nova Lite comes out ahead, 77 to 33 and 28 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
AmazonNova Lite
77/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.24
- Context300K
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
28/100- ECI—
- Price$1.50 / $7.50
- Context262K
Nova Lite is our pick
Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova LiteNova Lite $0.105 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova LiteNova Lite 300,000 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova LiteNova Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nova Lite | Pixtral Large (25.02) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 96 | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 50 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 39 | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 77/100 | 33/100 | 28/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nova LiteAmazon | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.06 (best) | $2.00 | $1.50 |
| Output | $0.24 (best) | $6.00 | $7.50 |
| Cached input | $0.015 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.105 (best) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $2.70 / $13.50 |
| Price source | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Median of 3 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 300,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 10,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | amazon.nova-lite-v1:0 | — | qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct |
| API providers | 3 | 3 | 7 (best) |
| Released | Dec 3, 2024 | Apr 8, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Oct 2024 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nova Lite$1.08
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nova Lite, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.105 per million tokens for Nova Lite versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (29× as much) and $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (29× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nova Lite has not been scored yet, Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova Lite, Pixtral Large (25.02) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Lite has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Nova Lite up to 10,000, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nova Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Nova Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Lite and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the newest, released Apr 8, 2025. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025; Nova Lite came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Lite Oct 2024, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
