ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Nova Lite vs Phi-4-mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct

Nova Lite comes out ahead, 77 to 58 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Amazon

    Nova Lite

    Released Dec 3, 2024

    77/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.06 / $0.24
    • Context300K
  2. Microsoft

    Phi-4-mini

    Released Dec 11, 2024

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.30
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct

    Released Sep 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.35 / $1.05
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Nova Lite is our pick

Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Phi-4-mini (58) and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (51). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNova LiteNova Lite $0.105 · Phi-4-mini $0.131 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNova LiteNova Lite 300,000 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct 131,072 · Phi-4-mini 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNova LiteNova Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Phi-4-mini: Text · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingPhi-4-mini and Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNova LitePhi-4-miniQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Price50%969263
Inputs & features30%702550
Context window20%392424
Overall100%77/10058/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nova Lite vs Phi-4-mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationNova LiteAmazonPhi-4-miniMicrosoftQwen2.5-VL 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.06 (best)$0.075$0.35
Output$0.24 (best)$0.30$1.05
Cached input$0.015——
Blended (3:1)$0.105 (best)$0.131$0.525
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Amazon Bedrock APIOfficial Azure APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window300,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output10,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDamazon.nova-lite-v1:0phi-4-miniqwen2-5-vl-7b-instruct
API providers3 (best)11
ReleasedDec 3, 2024Dec 11, 2024Sep 2024
Knowledge cutoffOct 2024Oct 2023Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nova Lite$1.08
  • Phi-4-mini$1.35
  • Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct$5.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nova Lite, Phi-4-mini or Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct?

Nova Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Phi-4-mini (58) and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (51). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite, Phi-4-mini or Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct?

Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Phi-4-mini costs $0.075 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Azure API price); Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct costs $0.35 input / $1.05 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.105 per million tokens for Nova Lite versus $0.131 for Phi-4-mini (1.2× as much) and $0.525 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nova Lite has not been scored yet, Phi-4-mini has not been scored yet and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova Lite, Phi-4-mini and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Lite has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct and 128,000 for Phi-4-mini. Maximum output per response: Nova Lite up to 10,000, Phi-4-mini up to 4,096, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nova Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Phi-4-mini accepts text; Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct accepts text and images. Nova Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Phi-4-mini and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Phi-4-mini is the newest, released Dec 11, 2024. Nova Lite came out Dec 3, 2024; Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct came out Sep 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Lite Oct 2024, Phi-4-mini Oct 2023, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.