Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 48 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $4.00
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (48). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite $0.935 · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 44 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 62/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.33 (best) | $0.40 |
| Output | $2.75 (best) | $4.00 |
| Cached input | $0.083 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.935 (best) | $1.30 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Median of 9 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | — |
| API providers | 2 | 9 (best) |
| Released | Dec 2, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Oct 2025 | Mar 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking$12.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (48). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?
Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.40 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.935 per million tokens for Nova 2 Lite versus $1.30 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Maximum output per response: Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts text and images. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova 2 Lite is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Mar 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
