ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Nemotron VoiceChat vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Laguna M.1

Too close to call on our weighted score (Laguna M.1 68, Nemotron VoiceChat 65, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. NVIDIA

    Nemotron VoiceChat

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context128K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.40 / $3.20
    • Context262K
  3. Poolside

    Laguna M.1

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Laguna M.1 68/100, Nemotron VoiceChat 65/100, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron VoiceChat on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNemotron VoiceChat and Laguna M.1Nemotron VoiceChat Free · Laguna M.1 Free · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.5 122B-A10B and Laguna M.1Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Laguna M.1 262,144 · Nemotron VoiceChat 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BNemotron VoiceChat: Text, Audio · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Laguna M.1: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron VoiceChatQwen3.5 122B-A10BLaguna M.1
Price50%10048100
Inputs & features30%359035
Context window20%243737
Overall100%65/10058/10068/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron VoiceChat vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Laguna M.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron VoiceChatNVIDIAQwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)Laguna M.1Poolside
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
InputFree (best)$0.40Free (best)
OutputFree (best)$3.20Free (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)Free (best)$1.10Free (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Nvidia APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Poolside API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDnvidia/nemotron-voicechatqwen3.5-122b-a10bpoolside/laguna-m.1
API providers119 (best)2
ReleasedMar 16, 2026Feb 23, 2026Apr 28, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron VoiceChatFree
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
  • Laguna M.1Free
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron VoiceChat, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Laguna M.1?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Laguna M.1 68/100, Nemotron VoiceChat 65/100, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron VoiceChat on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron VoiceChat, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Laguna M.1?

Nemotron VoiceChat is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Laguna M.1 costs Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Poolside API price); Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Nemotron VoiceChat is listed as free.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron VoiceChat has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and Laguna M.1 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron VoiceChat, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Laguna M.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Laguna M.1 have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 128,000 for Nemotron VoiceChat. Maximum output per response: Nemotron VoiceChat up to 8,192, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, Laguna M.1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron VoiceChat accepts text and audio; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video; Laguna M.1 accepts text. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Laguna M.1 is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. Nemotron VoiceChat came out Mar 16, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.