Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Seed 2.0 Mini
Seed 2.0 Mini comes out ahead, 80 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
NVIDIANemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.80
- Context262K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Mini
80/100- ECI—
- Price$0.03 / $0.297
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Seed 2.0 Mini is our pick
Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 2.0 MiniSeed 2.0 Mini $0.097 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Mini 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 MiniNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text · Seed 2.0 Mini: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Seed 2.0 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 72 | 98 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 80/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.03 (best) |
| Output | $0.80 | $0.297 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.0059 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35 | $0.097 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.059 / $0.594 |
| Price source | Official Nvidia API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b | doubao-seed-2-0-mini-260428 |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 8 |
| Released | Mar 11, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$3.60
- Seed 2.0 Mini$0.891
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Seed 2.0 Mini?
Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Seed 2.0 Mini?
Seed 2.0 Mini is cheaper at $0.03 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.097 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Mini versus $0.35 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (3.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Seed 2.0 Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Mini. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144, Seed 2.0 Mini up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Seed 2.0 Mini accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.0 Mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Mar 11, 2026. Seed 2.0 Mini came out Feb 14, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Mercury 2Three-way comparison
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Mercury 2Inception
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Mistral Small 4Mistral AI
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed
- Seed 2.0 Mini vs Ministral 3 3BMistral AI
- Seed 2.0 Mini vs Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle
