Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Laguna M.1 vs Mercury 2
Laguna M.1 comes out ahead, 68 to 54 and 53 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
NVIDIANemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.80
- Context262K
- Our pick
PoolsideLaguna M.1
68/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context262K
InceptionMercury 2
53/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.75
- Context128K
Laguna M.1 is our pick
Laguna M.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54) and Mercury 2 (53). It leads on price. Mercury 2 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna M.1Laguna M.1 Free · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.35 · Mercury 2 $0.375 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Laguna M.1Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Laguna M.1 262,144 · Mercury 2 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text · Laguna M.1: Text · Mercury 2: Text
- Self-hostingNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Laguna M.1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Laguna M.1 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 72 | 100 | 70 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 68/100 | 53/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA | Laguna M.1Poolside | Mercury 2Inception |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | Free (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.80 | Free (best) | $0.75 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.025 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35 | Free (best) | $0.375 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Nvidia API | Official Poolside API | Official Inception API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 50,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b | poolside/laguna-m.1 | mercury-2 |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 2 | 1 |
| Released | Mar 11, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Jan 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$3.60
- Laguna M.1Free
- Mercury 2$4.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Laguna M.1 or Mercury 2?
Laguna M.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54) and Mercury 2 (53). It leads on price. Mercury 2 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Laguna M.1 or Mercury 2?
Laguna M.1 is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Poolside API price). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price); Mercury 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (official Inception API price). Laguna M.1 is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet, Laguna M.1 has not been scored yet and Mercury 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Laguna M.1 and Mercury 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Laguna M.1 have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 128,000 for Mercury 2. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144, Laguna M.1 up to 32,768, Mercury 2 up to 50,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Laguna M.1 accepts text; Mercury 2 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Laguna M.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mercury 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Laguna M.1 is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B came out Mar 11, 2026; Mercury 2 came out Feb 24, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Mercury 2 Jan 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
