ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning comes out ahead, 69 to 55 and 45 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.85
    • Context256K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Released Apr 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.32 / $3.00
    • Context1M
  3. Arcee AI

    Trinity Large Thinking

    Released Apr 1, 2026Beta

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.80
    • Context524K
01 — Verdict

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is our pick

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Trinity Large Thinking (55) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (45). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceTrinity Large ThinkingTrinity Large Thinking $0.388 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $1.74 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · Trinity Large Thinking 524,288 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · Trinity Large Thinking: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningDeepSeek V4 ProTrinity Large Thinking
Price50%693869
Inputs & features30%904535
Context window20%366049
Overall100%69/10045/10055/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIADeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$1.32$0.25 (best)
Output$0.85$3.00$0.80 (best)
Cached input——$0.06
Blended (3:1)$0.40$1.74$0.388 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersMedian of 49 providersOfficial Arcee API
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)524,288 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens384,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenOpenMDW-1.1
API model IDnvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning—trinity-large-thinking
API providers852 (best)6
ReleasedApr 28, 2026Apr 24, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—May 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro$19.20
  • Trinity Large Thinking$4.10
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Trinity Large Thinking (55) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (45). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Arcee API price). Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia); DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.32 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.388 per million tokens for Trinity Large Thinking versus $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (1× as much) and $1.74 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (4.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet, DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet and Trinity Large Thinking has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Trinity Large Thinking yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 524,288 for Trinity Large Thinking and 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, Trinity Large Thinking up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; Trinity Large Thinking accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro came out Apr 24, 2026; Trinity Large Thinking came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.