Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Trinity Large Thinking
Too close to call on our weighted score (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69, Trinity Large Thinking 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
71/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context262K
- NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.85
- Context256K
Arcee AITrinity Large Thinking
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.80
- Context524K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Trinity Large Thinking 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B on price and Trinity Large Thinking for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.087 · Trinity Large Thinking $0.388 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextTrinity Large ThinkingTrinity Large Thinking 524,288 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Trinity Large Thinking: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 69 | 69 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 45 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 36 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 71/100 | 69/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA | Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $0.25 | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.20 (best) | $0.85 | $0.80 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.087 (best) | $0.40 | $0.388 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 9 providers | Median of 4 providers | Official Arcee API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 256,000 tokens | 524,288 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 |
| API model ID | nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b | nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning | trinity-large-thinking |
| API providers | 12 (best) | 8 | 6 |
| Released | Aug 11, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 | Apr 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.90
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
- Trinity Large Thinking$4.10
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Trinity Large Thinking?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Trinity Large Thinking 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B on price and Trinity Large Thinking for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Trinity Large Thinking?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers; free on Nvidia). Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Arcee API price); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B versus $0.388 for Trinity Large Thinking (4.4× as much) and $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (4.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet and Trinity Large Thinking has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and Trinity Large Thinking yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Trinity Large Thinking has the largest context window at 524,288 tokens, against 262,144 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, Trinity Large Thinking up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; Trinity Large Thinking accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the newest, released Aug 11, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning came out Apr 28, 2026; Trinity Large Thinking came out Apr 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Mercury 2.5Inception
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Gemma 4 12B ITGoogle
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Mercury Edit 2Inception
